The conclusion of No one should be surprised to learn that, in India, there is growing interest in space exploration. After all, there is growing interest in China too, and Indian and China have a lot in common is

A) No one should be surprised to learn that, in India, there is growing interest in
space exploration B) There is growing interest in space exploration in China C) Indian and China have a lot in common

Option C

Explanation:

They both have a lot in common so people should not be surprised of the interest of India and China as both countries have common ends.

It must have been seen publicly that India and China have same mindset and always arrive at common grounds and globally it is obvious that India and China share resources, and understanding, then India growing interest in space exploration shouldn't be a surprise as India and China has been great partners as China are also into space exploration, they must have opened the eyes of there partner (India)

d is the correct answer.

b is incorrect because it makes food by itself

c is incorrect because us humans don't know how to produce their own food using the sun like plants.

a is incorrect because consumers can depend on carnivores for eating food for consumers to eat the dead organism. same thing with omnivores.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )