A researcher finds that people who own more than two cars have bigger homes, more garage space, and make more money than people who own only one or two cars. Therefore, the researcher concludes that having more than two cars causes people to have homes with bigger garages. According to Cook and Campbell's types of evidence, the researcher failed to eliminate:

A. falsifiability.
B. alternate forms reliability.
C. alternative explanations.
D. temporal precedence.

Alternative explanation

Explanation:

The alternative explanation is considered to be in all of the outcomes of the evaluation. These evaluations are formal or informal. There are many investigators, researchers, and managers that should be scrutinized outcomes for evaluations and the explanation so that new further information. The app-rant outcomes may be reflected by the methodological issues for example selection bias.

Thus in the above explanation people who have more than two cars have bigger homes. and have more money. So that people think that people who have a car garage and a bigger house have more money but the researcher here failed to eliminate the alternative explanation.  

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

answer; /// i do believe but not sure(nazi propaganda)//(anti-semitism); ( holocaust) plz check first; ///good luck