Scott is 61. he has just celebrated his 25th anniversary at his company. he felt that his gold watch was just a meaningless trinket and was glad that he balanced his work with family life. according to erik erikson, scott is in the stage of development called generativity vs.

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

What choices did the family of emmett till and their supporters make in exposing the brutality of his murder? how did these choices shape public reaction to the murder?

"quite frankly, this relationship is getting pretty boring. i always know exactly what bev is going to do and say about everything." the boredom of this relationship is linked to the