subject

A researcher was interested in finding out whether children's ability to exhibit self-control when offered unhealthy food changed with age. He asked parents of three-year-old, six-year-old, and nine-year-old children to bring their children into the laboratory, where they were allowed to eat as much candy, cookies, and cake as they wanted. The researcher then compared the amount of food eaten by children of the three different ages. This is an example of:

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
The primary purpose of a certificate of confidentiality is to: allow law enforcement to investigate abuse cases.protect researchers from disclosing conflicts of interest.prevent subjects from knowing the purpose of a study.protect identifiable research information from compelled disclosure.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
What were the anti-federalists against? a. the views of patrick henry b. ratification of the constitution without a bill of rights c. the declaration of independence from great britain d. a weak central government
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30
Give three examples of distinctive characteristics of conformity to typical american culture
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A researcher was interested in finding out whether children's ability to exhibit self-control when o...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2019 23:31
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2019 23:31
Questions on the website: 13722360