The 4th amendment allows search warrants to be issued for specific purposes, looking for a specific item or items that are thought to be illegal..

Is it enough to be "suspected" of terrorism, or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely? your response should be at least five sentences. use complete sentences and offer evidence to back up your opinion

Abrief, "first-step" presentation of a work to be completed is called a

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.