The cognitive tools associated with scarf model have been verified in brain studies to be effective techniques for reducing the threat response. true or false?

True

Explanation:

The premise of the SCARF model is correct and shows that the brain makes us to act in certain ways in order to maximize rewards and also minimize threats. The cognitive tools associated SCARF model has undergone verification by several researchers and have been found to be effective in reducing threat response. For example, classification and re-evaluation, as applied in brain studies, are known to be some cognitive tools used to reduction our reactions to threat.

answer: i dont know

explanation:

unyuoinjk

kn,khftdctfjvgkbhlnjmk,l; jnhgbfdcsedrftgyuij; okpl'iuytredtwsdeyrfuijkol'

[olp

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.