What did this mean for dred scott?
check any of the boxes that apply. plz

scott was not a citizen of the united states.

scott was the property of the federal government.

scott had no right to sue for his freedom in court.

scott was considered the property of the slaveholding family.

A, Scott was not a citizen of the United States.

Explanation:

In Dred Scott vs Sandford, the fourth held that the constitution of the United States of America is only meant for Americans and does it include Black, either free or bound.

answer; dead end or culdesac;

do you have options to your question?