According to the focus on neuroscience box titled "psychological research using brain imaging" which of the following is not among the limitations of brain-imaging techniques?

- It is difficult to produce a highly detailed image of the brain.

Explanation:

Brain-imaging techniques are associated with the use of strategies that assist in either directly or obliquely imaging the structure, operation, or working of the human brain and the nervous system. It assists the researchers to evaluate the problems associated with the brain of a human.

As per the given description, the limitation of brain-imaging would not include that 'it is difficult to produce a highly detailed image of the brain' as brain-imaging allows us to produce even the 'activation maps reflecting flow of blood to several parts of the brain' through fMRI and various other techniques allows to image the functionality in order to know the problems within the brain. Therefore, this goes against the limitations.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer: b has a great day

explanation: