Special purpose districts in texas are:

a. democratic in theory but often not in practice.
b. the best example of participatory democracy in texas because of high voter participation.
c. created and administered by county clerks.
d. a less common form of government than they were 50 years ago.

a. democratic in theory but often not in practice.

Explanation:

Special purpose districts are often also called hidden government systems as the action and duties or responsibilities of various officials and stakeholders is not clear for scrutiny by media. Also, in Texas there are over 1,100 educational special districts as such districts usually focus on only one special service. The lack of transparency makes it harder for the authorities to understand the internal bureaucratic system and therefore, they are considered democratic in theory but often not in practice.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

aliens arent real sorry bud