Which, if any, of the trait(s) below should serve as a warning sign for potentially aggressive people in terms of their sexual behavior and/or approach to relationships?
a. talks over partner
b. argumentative
c. does not respect or follow rules
d. materialistic exchange oriented - wants something for everything e. real "player intoxicated/high
f. none of these are warning signs
g. i'm not sure

Options A, B, C, D and E should serve as a warning sign for potentially aggressive people.

Explanation:

All of the signs serve as a warning sign for potentially aggressive people. Option A and Option C talks about how a person does not respect or not care about the others: when you talk over someone, you are demonstraining, in a sort of passive way, that what the other person is saying is not important or isn't right, and what you are saying is what the others have to listen. When a person does not follow or respect rules, they are showing that things have to go their manner, and doesn't respect teamwork; the inability to be in teams (and not only in the sports field) speaks about how that person is selfish and self-centered. All of these, added to the person being argumentative, it is a dangerous combination. Not only that person doesn't care or even respect others, but they will also argue when something does not go as they wanted and will blame the others for it.

Option D might be interpreted as a way of manipulation: an aggresive person will help the others, will do anything in their power to try to help someone who needs it, but in the end they will want something in return. And if the person that they helped, doesn't give anything in return, they will make them feel bad saying that they were the only ones who helped them when they need it the most or they can also say that they owe them for the favour.

Option E is an enhancer for any agressive or violent situation. A person that consumes hard drugs can have multiple consequences, from loss of consciousness or memory, trigger emotions (sadness, nostalgia, anger, etc.), get involved in violent situations and even cause death.

In summary, all of these options separately serve as warning signs, but combined are extremely dangerous and we have to be alert.

good question. i'll be looking into that. (this is a joke sir)

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.