Use the quote to answer the question below. ‘we have before us one of the most important duties of the u. s. senate and of the u. s. congress, and that is to decide whether or not we will be involved in war. i think it is inexcusable that the debate over whether we involve the country in war, in another country’s civil war, that this would be debated as part of a spending bill, and not as part of an independent, free-standing think it is a sad day for the u. s. senate. it goes against our history of the country." -senator rand paul, senate floor speech, september 18, 2014 which foreign policy reality might limit what the senate can do in this scenario?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.