The majority party in the senate is concerned that the supreme court has made a number of ideologically dangerous and controversial rulings. which of the following actions would the senate take in their attempt to limit the supreme court’s power?

a. replace the chief justice of the supreme court with someone with whom they agree with ideologically
b. pass legislation that would limit the impact of the supreme court’s recent rulings
c. ratify a constitutional amendment limiting the supreme court’s power
d. enforce term limits for justices on the supreme court

Option A

Explanation:

The best is to replace the chief justice of the supreme court with someone that they agree with because if they keep amending the constitution, and passing legislations just to the correct the rulings, it might take time and the effect might just keep getting worse.

Once they replace with someone that understands their ideology, they can reduce the effect of these rulings

it is loom ps i took the test

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.