Social Studies, 20.12.2019 20:31 mimibear2932

In his book crime and everyday life, marcus felson (2002) expands on "routine activity theory" as an explanation for why crime occurs. according to this theory, crimes happen when three elements come together: (a) a motivated offender, (b) an attractive victim, and (c) absence of capable guardians. select one property crime and one violent crime. apply routine activity theory to explain examples of each. are you using theory in an inductive or deductive way?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Property crime refers to the fact that an individual or group of individuals use force in order to obtain some benefit that would be monetary in the majority of cases

Explanation:

Property crime refers to the fact that an individual or group of individuals use force in order to obtain some benefit that would be monetary in the majority of cases, one example of this kind of crimes would be the robbery of a cellphone, in which the victim, a young female, is walking alone in the downtown streets at 5:30 am, really early in the morning in order to go to the workplace. The burglar is a drug addict, whose drugs are over at that time, and he takes advantage of the situation, an indefense woman and the police is not close to the scene. Therefore in this case, it is possible to see how the three necessary factors according to the routine activity theory meet: (a) a motivated offender, (b) an attractive victim, and (c) absence of capable guardians.

The second case, the violent crime, refers to the instance in which the offender wants to hurt his victim in a certain way. One example of this kind of crime could be when a kidnapped occurs, the criminal studies his victim in advance because he wants to politically pressure his adversary by kidnapping his daughter; all of this in order to force him organizing everything for his political party to lose the next elections. Once the elections have been completed and the criminal achieves his goal, he also asks his adversary to withdraw completely from politics and then releases his daughter. In this case, the criminal uses suffering as pressure to achieve his mission and it is possible to analyze as well as the 3 stages mentioned by "routine activity theory" (a) a motivated offender, (b) an attractive victim, and (c) absence of capable guardians; are carried out.

Answer from: davidoj13

As given in the statement of the problem,according to Marcus Felson(2002),this theory states that crimes happen when the three elements combine,so basically it is deducting an analysis so this is an deductive way to solve the problem.

Answer from: Quest

i think it's b or c hope this

Answer from: Quest

Communism best describes china's government

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30

Arelationship where each person relies on the other; a give and take relationship

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00

Which statement best explains how world war ii to end the great depression? a. new job opportunities opened as the united states produced more military products. b. the u.s. army provided new jobs that paid better than any other work at the time. c. people had to worry more about war problems than about the economic crisis. d. the war caused people to trust the economy enough to spend more money.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:50

Attitudes toward homeless people. negative attitudes toward poor people are negative when a person is homeless? to find out, a common. are attitudes more description of a poor person is read to subjects. there are two versions of this description. one begins jim is a 30-year-old single man he is currently living in a small single-room apartment the other description begins jim is a 30-year-old single man. he is currently homeless and lives in a shelter for homeless people. otherwise, the descriptions are the same. after reading the description, you ask subjects what they believe about jim and what they think should be done to 26 him. the subjects are 544 adults interviewed by telephone. outline the design of this experiment.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

In his book crime and everyday life, marcus felson (2002) expands on "routine activity theory" as an...

Questions