In "civil disobedience," what is thoreau’s view of the state at the end of the essay? he thinks the state does not appreciate individual worth. he finds the state guilty of gross misjudgment of his actions. he feels sorry for the state for not acting in a sensible way. he considers the state’s actions indicative of society’s unfairness.

   He feels sorry for the state for not acting in a sensible way

Explanation:  Henry David Thoreau stated that citizens should disobey obedience to the state if the state behaves unfairly to them. Specifically, to ignore laws that are unjust. In his work "Civil Disobedience", he described his views as well as the experience of refusing to pay taxes to the state, considering it as his act of disobedience, but as a general view of the otherwise unfair taxes imposed on citizens by the state. In doing so, he criticised the state and called for civil disobedience in order for the state to treat the citizens more fairly and to truly fulfil the supposed role of the state as a protector for the rights of citizens. Because if the state fulfilled its supposed role, the need for disobedience would not exist. As the state did not act in accordance with what Thoreau thought, he even imprisoned him for criticising the state, and in his work he wrote exactly how disappointed he was and regretted the actions of the state.

the historians cited in the article all agree with one another about the cause of the civil war. despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, the historians agree that slavery was the root cause of the civil war. the fact that all these historiansgenerally agree with one another makes their shared viewpoints more reliable and valid, especially because the historians have different backgrounds and all work for the well-respected institutions of howard university, clemson university, and the university of colorado.