Lesley, a sociology major, believes that money is the key to happiness. her friend stephen, a psychology major, believes that good health is the key to happiness. how might the two friends resolve their disagreement? select one: a. they could ask their friends and see which perspective has the most support. b. they could conduct a study with students on their campus to see which perspective has the most support. c. they could research archives of newspapers, magazines, and other media to see if there are reports on the topic. d. they could research peer-reviewed articles to see if either perspective is supported.

d. They could research peer-reviewed articles to see if either perspective is supported.                              

Explanation:

It is given in the question that both the students of sociology major, Lesley and Stephen, have two different views on happiness. One claims that money is important for happiness while the other says that good health is important to be happy in life.

Therefore both Stephen and Lesley should research and do a study on each other's articles and see if the either perspective view is well supported or not.  In this way, the can come to a conclusion.

Hence the correct option is (d).

the 2nd option is the answer

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.