The local homeless shelter is expecting to host its largest dinner this year and has doubled its order for fresh, whole grain bread from the bakery that always supplies it. the bakery has run low on whole grain flour, however, so places a rush order with its main supplier. for the homeless shelter, the buying situation is a(n) and for the bakery it is a(n)

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; they both highlight the power of the situation in determining behavior;

answer; southeast asians in the u.s.'