Which statement is true about lifetime adversity? group of answer choices people with modest lifetime adversity are less negatively affected by exposure to recent adversity. adults with no history of adversity respond optimally when faced with life stressors. high levels of lifetime adversity strengthen people's coping skills and foster resilience. compared to adults with a history of modest lifetime adversity, those with no adversity report greater life satisfaction.

The correct answer is People with modest lifetime adversity are less negatively affected by exposure to recent adversity.

Explanation: As this group of people who already live with adversity in a moderate way are not negatively affected precisely because they have already been exposed to adversity, unlike people who are not exposed to adversity have a negative reaction to adversity.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

on the first day of new student week, amber revealed to her roommate that she is a lesbian. this is an example of self-disclosure.