Spanish conquistadors brought their horses with them when they crossed the atlantic.
which was an unintentional consequence of that action?

a. horses multiplied so quickly in the americas that the wild herds threatened sugarcane plantations and other livestock.

b. central american indians replaced their tribal gods with a new religion that focused on horses.

c. by the mid-1700s, the plains indians were expert horsemen who relied on their herds for buffalo hunting and trade.

d. the conquistadors traveled thousands of miles as they explored central america and the american southwest.

The correct answer is C. An unintentional consequence of the arrival of horses to America brought by Spanish conquistadors was that by the mid-1700s, the Plains Indians were expert horsemen who relied on their herds for buffalo hunting and trade.

Explanation:

The horse was introduced to the American continent with the arrival of the European conquerors in 1492. The European military used these animals as a means of transport, a work tool and even for military purposes.

Once introduced to the continent, this animal gave Europeans a considerable advantage in battle, as it provided faster mobility and a higher position from which to fight; its use was one of the strategic keys of the victory of the conquerors over the natives.

This animal, once introduced in the continent, began to reproduce and form increasingly numerous groups. Both Europeans and natives used it; In the case of the latter, who lived a life more in contact with nature, hunted and worked the land, the horse became an indispensable tool for day to day activities. Thus, as an indirect consequence of its introduction by Europeans, the horse became a fundamental element of the lives of Native Americans.

both the house and senate must approve the conference report.   after it is approved by both on an identical from, it will be sent to the president.   if the president approves it, it will become law.

it should be c, women were allowed to vote in all states because federal law supersedes state law.

"states can make their own laws, as long as they don't contradict what the federal law states. the states do not have the authority to pass a law that negates a federal law." -google