subject
Social Studies, 03.12.2019 20:31 vanessa23272

The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that have submitted
cases for the court's review. the justices then select about
75 cases to more fully review and decide. for each case,
the justices debate the facts and then vote on a ruling. the
court rules in favor of whichever side is supported by the
majority of the justices. one justice then writes a majority
opinion, summarizing the court's reasoning. justices who
disagree with the ruling may write their own dissenting
opinions to explain their objections.
which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this
description of the supreme court's decision-making process?
o
a. the supreme court is required to make a decision on every case
that is appealed to it.
o
b. the supreme court does not hear public arguments before
deciding which cases to review.
c. dissenting opinions are written by lawyers representhig the losing
party rather than justices.
o
d. two-thirds of the justices have to agree on a ruling rather than a
simple majority

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:30
Inspired by the example of that great cornellian, vladimir nabokov, some of your friends have become amateur lepidopterists (they study butterflies). often when they return from a trip with specimens of butterflies, it is very difficult for them to tell how many distinct species they've caught— to the fact that many species look very similar to one another. solution
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which principle underlies the idea of limited govemment?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
The platt amendment of 1901 forbade cuba from entering into any treaties that would allow undue foreign involvement in cuban affairs. this law was passed after the spanish-american war to make sure that european nations weren’t going to get involved with cuba. 1, why might the platt amendment be considered ironic? 2, what reasons would the united states have for not wanting european influence in cuba?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that hav...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.02.2020 01:52
question
Mathematics, 19.02.2020 01:52
Questions on the website: 13722362