In a two-phase study, participants were randomly assigned to either group a or group b. all participants were subjected to a series of irritating air puffs directed at the face. in the first phase of the study, participants in group a pressed a button that stopped the air puffs. participants in group b pressed a button that had no effect on the air puffs. in the second phase of the study, both groups had buttons that, if pressed, would stop the air puffs. which of the following disorders is hypothesized to result most frequently from real-world conditions that are similar to those used in the study? a. bipolarb. dependent personalityc. obsessive-compulsived. major depressivee. autism spectrum

Which leader was the first african american president at two different institutions for higher learning

Opinion polls reveal that many people believe that the military buildup of the 1980s came at the expense of pressing domestic problems such as environmental pollution and deteriorating educational and transportation infrastructure. in short, people are becoming aware of

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.