One of your subjects is half way through a study of an investigational antidepressant that is injected weekly. the drug requires a taper-down regimen, that is, it should not be stopped abruptly. you learn that the subject will be admitted to prison next week prior to the next scheduled injection. what is the appropriate response for the researcher?
a. the researcher should contact the judge in the case, asking that person to intervene.
b. tell the subject to let prison authorities know that he is on an investigational medication that cannot be discontinued.
c. the researcher should contact prison authorities of the medical issue, and report the events to the irb of record.
d. the researcher should remove the subject from the study since it was not approved for prison.

world war i had a devastating effect on german-americans and their cultural heritage. up until that point   german-americans, as a group, had been spared much of the discrimination, abuse, rejection, collective mistrust experienced by so many different racial and ethnic groups in the history of the united states. indeed, over the years, they had been viewed as a well integrated and esteemed part of american society. all of this change with the outbreak of war.  

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.