When brad shows up for his college classes, he is rarely prepared. he does not study or do his assignment, frequently forgets to bring a notebook or something to write with, and often falls asleep during the class. he is often late to class and skips class just as frequently. when his professor asks him what he wants to do with his life, he just shrugs and says, "whatever comes along." brad would probably be factor of the big five personality trait theory.

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

Which best describes why it is necessary to evaluate a solution?

What is generally true of the lower house in a state legislative branch ?