You are a federal prosecutor trying an important "landmark" case. you are quite certain that, no matter which way the case is decided, it will someday have its subject matter argued before the united states supreme court. you feel this way because the case's subject matter is clearly of significant national importance. if, in fact, the u. s. supreme court does want to hear the case after your trial has concluded, what will they do?

Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional

What do both article ii of the arizona constitution and the first amendment to the us constitution grant? check all that apply. right to assemble right to legal search and seizure freedom of the press freedom of religion right to maintain a militia

John lennon and paul mccartney belonged to this group