Some researchers examining the validity of the implicit associations test (iat) have suggested that an absence of correlation between the iat and measures of explicit prejudice actually supports the iat's validity. this is because the iat is believed to measure unconscious, or implicit, prejudice. the result is that the validity of the iat can be supported whether correlations with other measure of prejudice are low or high. this is a problem for which of the six principles of critical thinking?

Bob: coke is baby pandas.jim: what? how do you figure that coke is baby pandas? bob: because this book says so.jim: how do we know the book is correct? bob: because it says that coke is baby pandas.jim: how does that prove the book's accuracy? bob: because it's statement involving coke and baby pandas is correct, therefore it is accurate.jim: how do we know that it's correct? bob: because we have concluded that the book is accurate, and therefore the statement is correct.therefore, coke is baby pandas.

True. r u cheating on a test. bro not cool.

Darren is taking out a family order task