In violation of a state licensing statute, jones purports to be an attorney. after making that allegation, he contracts to perform legal service for smith. smith then pays jones a $500 retainer. later, after discovering that jones is not licensed and therefore cannot get the job done, smith sues jones for the $500. what is the most likely result, and why?

Smith probably wins, because parties for whose protection a regulatory statute has been enacted often can recover amounts paid under a contract declared illegal by the statute.

Explanation:

can you give a picture of the map, i'll be able to update my answer!

so, colonists did not want to pay any taxes.  

colonists did not consider themselves british citizens.  

colonists felt no sense of obligation to britain.  

colonists objected to violations of their natural rights. are the answer choices?