In contrast to behaviorism, recent learning theory has emphasized the role of cognition: a) the conditioned stimulus an animal predict the unconditioned one. b)this relationship exists when the unconditioned stimulus is surprising and the conditioned stimulus comes – it. c) in such cases, the animal makes the connection between the stimuli especially –

A) predict

B) before

C)easily

Explanation:

This ideas fight those of the behaviorists because they believe that knowledge exists independently and outside of people. Behaviorists believe that learning actually occurs when new behaviors or changes in behaviors are acquired through associations between stimuli and responses.

Cognition theories contrast those of the behaviorists because it would mean that there is an innate stimulus and helps the animal predict an outcome.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

the answer is either c or d i think its d