Yun tung chow tried to unclog a floor drain in the kitchen of the restaurant where he worked. he used a drain cleaner called lewis red devil lye that contained crystalline sodium hydroxide. the product label said to wear eye protection, to put one tablespoon of lye directly into the drain, and to keep one’s face away from the drain, because there could be dangerous backsplash. without eye protection, chow mixed three tablespoons of lye in a can, and poured that mixture down the drain while bending over it. liquid splashed back into his face, causing injury. he brought a product liability suit based on inadequate warnings and design defect. the trial court granted summary judgment to the manufacturer, and chow appealed. an expert for chow stated that the product was defective, because it had a tendency to splash. is that a convincing argument? why or why not?

Does a fiscal court handles matters concerning domestic disputes?

The authors of the paper "fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course"† carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. all students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. at the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. the researchers concluded that "overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. give a brief explanation for your choice.

Compare the systems of government in great britain and the united states.