Samantha habitually blurted out answers to questions during class discussion. mr. hargrove repeatedly called samantha by name and told her to wait her turn, but samantha repeated her behavior day after day. mr. hargrove finally realized that his strategy was not working. he thought he was using a form of punishment, but his strategy turned out to be: a. negative reinforcement of the behavior.
b. positive reinforcement of the behavior.
c. the antecedent for the behavior.
d. the unconditioned stimulus.

we need an attachment to see what you are talking about.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.