John c. clark, using an alias, rented a luxury car from ezcar in california. clark never returned the car to ezcar and obtained a california "quick title" using forged signatures. he then sold the car to terry for $34,000 in cash. terry made improvements to the car and had it insured, registered, licensed, and titled in the state of utah. when ezcar reported the car stolen, the utah department of motor vehicles seized the auto and returned it to ezcar. terry sued ezcar. the trial court concluded that terry had purchased the car for value and without notice that it was stolen, so he was a bona fide purchaser entitled to the car. ezcar appealed. rule.

a. ezcar has no rights to the car anymore.
b. terry can keep the car
c. terry must return the car to clark.
d. terry must return the car to ezcar.

d. Terry must return the car to EZCar.

Explanation:

                A bona fide purchaser is one who purchases or buys a property for value that is deceived or cheated by the seller into entering into a purchase contract without verifying the details.

                 It is the responsibility of Terry to check and verify all the details before purchasing a property from an unknown person. Terry must check the details of the car that Clark had sold him. Since Terry has unknowingly purchased the car without knowing that the car was a stolen property of EZCar, Terry will not be accused of any charges but he will not have any right of possession of the car. He is deceived by Clark and now Terry will have to return the car to EZCar.

Thus the answer is

d. Terry must return the car to EZCar.

d is the correct answer.

b is incorrect because it makes food by itself

c is incorrect because us humans don't know how to produce their own food using the sun like plants.

a is incorrect because consumers can depend on carnivores for eating food for consumers to eat the dead organism. same thing with omnivores.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: