Included or exported in gdp: 1. chocolate express, a swiss chocolate company, produces a chocolate bar at a plant in illinois on december 1, 2016. an elementary school student buys the chocolate bar on december 20.2. graincorp, a u. s. agricultural company, produces corn syrup at a plant in iowa on september 19, 2020. it sells the corn syrup to crunchy's for use in the production of cereal that will be made in the united states in 2020. (note: focus exclusively on whether production of the corn syrup increases gdp directly, and ignore the effect of production of the cereal on gdp.)3. athleticus, a u. s. shoe company, produces a pair of sneakers at a plant in vietnam on march 21, 2016. athleticus imports the pair of sneakers into the united states on may 18, 2016.4. you chop down a cherry tree on your property in california and make a dining room table in 2016. a similar table sells for $800 in a local furniture store.5. awake cafe, a u. s. coffee company, produces a latte at its location in minneapolis on january 26, 2016. it sells the latte to a customer immediately.

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.