Can y’all me to get the right answer

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

How did the aztec culture benefit spain when they were conquering the aztecs?

Click on  the link  to view information gathered by the organization keep america beautiful. read "the costs of american littering" to find three negative effects of litter in local communities.  based on your research, what are the negative effects of litter in local communities? check all that apply.litter cleanup is very expensive.litter has decreased since 1969.litter is a constant community problem.litter causes property in the community to be less valuable.litter contaminates water and has other environmental consequences.