Suppose the united states imposes higher steel tariffs. how does the change in steel import restrictions affect automobile manufacturers who use steel as an input?
a. the automobile industry will experience job loss as manufacturers are more likely to relocate to other countries.
b. the tariff change will prompt automobile manufacturers to lower the price of vehicles.
c. the cost of producing automobiles will decrease.
d. automobile manufacturers will become more profitable as the price of steel falls.

A. The automobile industry will experience job loss as manufacturers are more likely to relocate to other countries.

Explanation:

As automobile manufacturers use steel as an input, any high steel tariff raises their cost of producing automobiles in the U.S. They couldn't produce the same amount of automobiles for the same cost of producing and they couldn't change steel as an input for production. Looking to keep or low their cost of producing automobiles, manufacturers are likely to relocate to other countries, firing employees in the U.S. automobile industry.

A. The automobile industry will experience job loss as manufacturers are more likely to relocate to other countries.

Explanation:

When the price of an input increases, the cost of production of a manufacture increases, making the product less competitive as it becomes expensive. Thus, the company will outline a strategy to maintain its competitiveness. This may involve lowering labor costs, increasing unemployment, or shifting your production matrix to a place where there are no tariff barriers to inputs.

answer; the population in brazil is very diverse there are many races and ethnic groups

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.