When evaluating scientific reports, we must look at all of the following except: who is making the claim (credentials) who is funding the source if the report is biased how are other authorities responding to the claim does the outcome provide practical solutions?

"Does the outcome provide practical solutions?"

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question we can say that we must look at all of the statements mentioned in the question except for "Does the outcome provide practical solutions?". This is because the advancement of science should always be done regardless of whether or not the outcomes provide practical solutions. This is determined by putting the outcomes to different experiments in the future, but does not remove the fact that the scientific reports should be thoroughly evaluated.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

answer; engram;