Which was thomas malthus's argument? which was thomas malthus's argument?
a. he argued that if there was no control over population growth, then we would simply create technology to correct the problem.
b. he argued that if there was no control over population growth, then the population would come under check because of war, disease, and starvation.
c. he argued that if there was no control over population growth, then our civilization would be consumed by famine and war by the end of the 20th century.
d. he argued that if there was no control over population growth, then population numbers would increase indefinitely and this would not cause problems.

The correct answer is the option C

Explanation:Thomas Robert Malthus argued that if left unchecked, a population will outgrow its resources, leading to a host of problems. In this lesson, we will define and discuss the Malthusian theory of population growth.For example, if every member of a family tree reproduces, the tree will continue to grow with each generation. On the other hand, food production increases arithmetically, so it only increases at given points in time. Malthus wrote that, left unchecked, populations can outgrow their resources.

jupiter is mainly composed of hydrogen and helium just like a star. spectral analysis of jupiter has revealed that in addition to hydrogen and helium, the planet is made of water, methane and ammonia. those elements are in trace amounts. the core of the planet is thought to contain some rock and metallic hydrogen. i hope this will give you the answer to your question! : d

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."