In a large republic there are men of large fortunes, and consequently of less moderation; there are trusts too great to be placed in any single subject; he has interest of his own; he soon begins to think that he may be happy, great and glorious, by oppressing his fellow citizens; and that he may raise himself to grandeur on the ruins of his country.—brutus no. 1 which model of representative democracy does brutus warn against in this excerpt?

Federalism.

Explanation:

Brutus is the pseudonym of Robert Yates (1738-1801), an American politician known for his anti-federalist views. On his Brutus’ Anti-Federalist No. 1 essay of 1787, Yates argued against the proposed constitution of the United States, which sought to establish a federal republic, with the states united in a single republic under a central government.

Brutus's main concern was that by subjecting the states to a federation, this central government may grow too large and powerful. This power could then be used arbitrarily and for the benefit of a select few: "there are trusts too great to be placed in any single subject; he has interest of his own; he soon begins to think that he may be happy, great and glorious, by oppressing his fellow citizens; and that he may raise himself to grandeur on the ruins of his country."

answer; i believe it was by president pranab mukherjee or by the chief justice of kerala high court; ///plz check luck

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals