Amanda reiss was injured at a wedding reception at a private home. amanda tripped over a piece of rebar that was sticking from the end of one portion of a sidewalk leading to the front door. amanda’s lawyer believes that the homeowners were aware of the rebar problem and that other guests to the home had tripped over it but not been injured. how can amanda’s lawyer get the information about the homeowner’s knowledge? a. he cannot because they are not required to talk with amanda’s lawyers b. he can depose the homeowners c. he can depose others who have been guests d. both b and c

d. both b and c

Explanation:

The lawyer can get information both by deposing the homeowners and others who have been guests

What is a deposition law ?

Deposition are generally used in USA and Canada. An information is collected in order to establish information that can be used in court , the witness that are used in deposition are called deponent .

They can be oral deposition and written deposition

Oral Depositions 

When deposition is done it is usually out of the court however individual parties will monitor it such as Amanda's lawyer in this case.

Commonly the people who facilitate a deposition are attorneys, deponent , all other parties involved and a certified person to carry the paths.

In other instances recordings may take place in which the information can be recorded as people give infromation everyone involved in the case may ask the witness

im sorry i wish i can but try google

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.