Recall that taylor and fiske (1975) conducted a clever experiment in which a group of participants observed a scripted conversation between two male confederates. some could see both of the men; others could see the face of only one or the other man. when asked questions about the two confederates (e. g., who had taken the lead in the conversation), participants who had a clear view of both men thought they were equally influential, whereas those who faced one or the other thought that the man whose face they saw was more influential. these results demonstrated that

The salience of perceptual stimuli is a good description of how we can end up with attribution error.

Explanation:

This means we can make error in how we define others based on what aspect of them we focused more on or what aspect we didn't focus on.

Salience bias or perceptual salience is how our thinking can be bias sometimes as we tend to focus more on prominent or emotionally capturing individuals than those who seems not noticeable eventhough those differences may not be relevant if we were to think more objectively.

People may be speaking about the same topic but we may tend to listen more to the famous actress saying the same thing which is said by our neighbor just because our neighbor isn't prominent .

its d. you give me brainliest

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.