Social Studies, 27.09.2019 21:00 Xghoued2056

Several industries have recently switched at least partly from older technologies powered by fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. it is thus evident that less fossil fuel is being used as a result of the operations of these industries than would have been used if these industries had retained their older technologies.
which of the following, if true, most strengthen the argument above? a) many of the industries that have switched to at least partly to new technologies have increased their output. b) less fossil fuel was used to manufacture the machinery employed in the new technologies than was originally used to manufacture the machinery employed in the older technologies. c) more electricity is used to by those industries that have switched at least partly to the new technologies than by those industries that have not switched. d) some of the industries that have switched at least partly to the new technologies still use primarily technologies that are powered by fossil fuel. e) the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than amount that would have been used to power the older technologies.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30

Why did the settlement of east texas stop in the late 1710s

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00

Germany's black forest is being destroyed as a result of which environmental issue ?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:50

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Several industries have recently switched at least partly from older technologies powered by fossil...

Questions