1.
according to the law of supply, suppliers want to sell their product at prices.
low
high
consistent
2.
according to the law of demand, consumers want to purchase a product at prices.
low
high
consistent
3.
which person is credited with introducing the concept of supply and demand?
milton friedman
thomas paine
adam smith

1. high

2. low

3. Adam Smith

Explanation:

Adam Smith, considered the "father" of modern economics defined the terms supply and demand to describe the dynamics between buyers, sellers, and prices.  He believed in "laissez-faire" economics, which means that businesses should be allowed to conduct trade with as little government intervention as possible.  This includes the freedom to sell their goods at whatever price they want.  A supplier will always look to obtain the greatest profit, and in order to do so they will try to sell a product at the highest price.  Consumers, on the other hand, will always want to buy a product for the lowest price.  They law of supply and demand states that the higher the price of a product, the lower the demand (or willingness of consumer to purchase said product), and vice versa.

the answer is:

it led to riots and destruction of jewish shops, homes, and synagogues.

it turned german citizens against jews.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )