subject
Social Studies, 20.09.2019 00:20 eggoysters

Antimaterialists tend to deride the importance of "things." yet, things are highly significant, not merely because of their functional utility but also because of their psychological impact. we develop relationships with things. things affect our sense of continuity or discontinuity. they play a role in the structure of situations, and the oreshortening of our relationships with things accelerates the pace of life. (alvin toffler, future shock)
a. nonargument.
b. argument; conclusion: we develop relationships with things.
c. argument; conclusion: antimaterialists tend to "things."
d. argument; conclusion: yet things are highly significant.
e. argument; conclusion: they play a role the pace of life.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00
How did the british react to the ninety-two resolution? why
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:30
Like many cities in the south, atlanta was poorly prepared to meet the emergency of the great depression.  which statement  bestdescribes how atlanta was poorly prepared?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What is most likely impact of clearing natural landscape to construct high rise buildings
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
Which region commonly traded fish? a. georgia b. southern colonies c. new england colonies d. middle colonies
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Antimaterialists tend to deride the importance of "things." yet, things are highly significant, not...
Questions
question
English, 26.08.2019 17:00
question
Mathematics, 26.08.2019 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722367