Briefly comment on the phrase "scientific certainty." is it an oxymoron (a combination of contradictory words), or are scientific theories considered to be the absolute truth?

Answer and Explanation:

Information about the normal world is continually changing in light of the fact that we are continually adding new perceptions and information as far as anyone is concerned base. As new information become accessible (regularly because of new advancements giving increasingly point by point and exact information), speculations, hypotheses, and logical

Actualities are reevaluated for consistency with the new data. For whatever length of time that new information is being included, the nature of logical truth will be liable to change. In this way, the phrase "scientific truth" is an oxymoron . After some time, logical proclamations by and large structure a grouping of progressively exact explanations,

this null effect is caused by a weak manipulation and ineffective internal validity. in a scientific study, as the one dr. morimoto is trying to perfom, internal validity refers to the confidence placed in the cause-effect relationship and to how well an experiment is done and able to eliminate confounding variables.        

answer; conflict perspective;