In which of the following cases did the court hold that due process requires that where a u. s. citizen is detained for allegedly fighting against the united states as an enemy combatant, that person should be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for his detention before a neutral decision maker? a. kyllo v. united statesb. hamdi v. rumsfeldc. katz v. united satesd. rasual v. bush

b. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case.

Explanation:

According to my research on different law cases that had to do with US citizens as traitors, It can be said that the case in question based on the information provided was the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case. This case was handled in 2004 and basically states (like mentioned in the question) that enemy combatants of the US that are US citizens have the right for due process.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

rain should be the answer.

answer; posthypnotic;