subject
Social Studies, 17.08.2019 23:10 emilylittle2442

Adoption agency representative: it is true that eight of our last ten babies have been placed with parents who were personally acquainted with at least one of our staff members before initiating the adoption process. however, there is no basis for the accusation against us of favoritism; our decisions have been guided solely by the best interests of the children. indeed, all ten babies' new parents far surpassed the adoption criteria set both by the law and by our own policy. which of the following is an assumption on which the representative's argument depends? (a) the agency's prior placements of babies with parents who were previously acquainted with its staff have not, in general, been more successful than those with parents unacquainted with the staff.(b) of those prospective parents who substantially surpassed the criteria for adoption, most were personally acquainted with agency staff before beginning the application process.(c) for a time period equal in duration to that during which the data were collected, the average number of babies placed by the agency is close to ten.(d) most prospective parents who apply to adopt babies do not meet the agency's criteria for adoption.(e) the agency will only place babies with parents who not only meet the legal and institutional criteria for adoption, but who in fact surpass those criteria.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:20
Name three things the framers of the constitution did to keep the federal government or any part of it from becoming too powerful.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What words in the preamble to the constitution reflect the principle of popular sovereignty
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00
Explain the correlation between industrialization and urban areas
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Adoption agency representative: it is true that eight of our last ten babies have been placed with...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 31.07.2019 23:30
question
Mathematics, 31.07.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722363