Is on-the-job training for recently graduated recruits from the police academy. the training is provided by specially selected patrol officers and is designed to supplement the theory taught at the police academy with the reality of the street.

Field training

Field training is on-the-job training for recently graduated recruits from the police academy. The training is provided by specially selected patrol officers and is designed to supplement the theory taught at the police academy with the reality of the street.

The reason why "field training" would be the correct answer is because recruits that just graduated from the police academy would conduct "field" training" before they go off on their own as a police officer.

The field training that the recent graduated recruits would experience hands on experience of what it is liked to be on duty as a police officer. This would allow them to get use to the environment of being a police officer and would allow them to get some training that they learned in the police academy and apply it to the hands on field training.

When they're doing field training, they would be with a experienced police officer that would lead them through what they learned and show them how to apply what they learned in the streets with their real job as a police officer.

one way archaeology us understand the past is through the material objects it finds, allowing us to know what was being used, and when. for example a dig recently found a flute, believed to be the oldest musical instrument found to date.

i hope this

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.