subject
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 05:40 0gNanaa

Aseller entered into a written contract to sell a tract of land to a buyer. the buyer was to pay $1,500 per month for five years, at which time the seller would deliver a warranty deed. the contract was silent as to the quality of title to be conveyed. after making 12 payments, the buyer discovered that a neighbor had an easement of way over the land, which was not discussed at the time the seller and buyer entered into the contract. the neighbor had not used the easement over the previous year because she had been out of the country. on the basis of the easement, the buyer wishes to cancel the contract. which party is more likely to prevail? a the seller, because the neighbor's easement has been extinguished. b the seller, because the buyer has no basis on which to rescind the contract. c the buyer, because the obligation to convey marketable title is implied. d the buyer, because the seller has breached the covenant against encumbrances.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:10
The tea party movement is a. an official third party that challenges both democrats and republicans in national elections. b. an organized challenge to incumbents in the republican party by the most conservative wing of the republican party. c. an organized challenge to incumbents in the democratic party by the most liberal wing of the democratic party. d. an offspring of the green party that runs for state and local office in many midwestern states. e. the now defunct party that gave way to the republican party at the end of the “second party system.”
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:00
Cattle are herbivores by nature and feeding herbivores a diet for carnivores may have triggered a protein reaction known as a prion causing mad cow disease
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
According to the article,"social credit" is question 3 options: an experiment to people talk on-line a farming experiment that hurt people under mao ze dong using someone else's data from the internet, to give or take away things such as the right to buy an airline ticket a credit you get in china for having friends in real life, and not just on social media
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Aseller entered into a written contract to sell a tract of land to a buyer. the buyer was to pay $1,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.10.2019 00:00
question
History, 09.10.2019 00:00
question
Mathematics, 09.10.2019 00:00
Questions on the website: 13722363