Aplaintiff sued a defendant for trespass. the defendant claimed the property in question belongs to her, not to the plaintiff. after a lengthy search through old family records stored in the defendant's attic, her attorney found an old deed that appears to provide a missing link in the plaintiff's title. the attorney immediately placed the deed in his office safe as part of his working file on the defendant's case. the plaintiff learned of the existence of the deed through other sources and seeks to inspect it and copy it. under modern discovery rules, may the plaintiff do so? a yes, because the deed was not prepared in anticipation of litigation. b yes, because the discovery rules trump the attorney work product doctrine. c no, because the efforts of the defendant's attorney constitute attorney work product. d no, because the deed was obviously never officially recorded and is therefore irrelevant to the case.