The term “self-concept” refers to a. the sum of one’s physiological, social, and psychological attributes as perceived by an impartial observer. b. the total of an individual’s own beliefs about his/her physical characteristics, intelligence, aptitudes, and social skills. c. the way an individual believes others perceive her/him. d. the sum of one’s psychological, social, and physical attributes as perceived by a significant other. e. none of the above.

b. the total of an individual’s own beliefs about his/her physical characteristics, intelligence, aptitudes, and social skills.

Explanation:

Self concept is a key term in humanist theories , (Psychology) and understood as   "The individual's belief about himself or herself, including the person's attributes and who and what the self is". Generally speaking is how someone thinks about himself, usually accompained by a evaluation , good or bad, and a perception , with self  awareness .

The self concept is an active , dynamic , and changeable image, since social factors and changing situations tend to influence it, as just any social event affects individual self esteem.

Self concept includes: self image, self esteem, and the ideal self.

While the person's belief experience their sense of worth, unworthiness, choices and decisions will alter, but more broadly a self concept will be more based on habits, over large time laps, together with developed skills and the personality traits.

The ability of one to reflect upon its skills, traits and behaviour is thus the broader self.

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

the old way of life was represented by superstition, an angry god, and absolute submission to authority. the thinkers of the age of reason ushered in a new way of thinking. this new way championed the accomplishments of humankind. individuals did not have to accept despair. science and reason could bring happiness and progress. kings did not rule by divine right. they had an obligation to their subjects. europeans pondered the implications for nearly a century. americans put them into practice first.