kanza and ranna are classmates whose parents are both originally from iran but who moved to the united states before the children were born. they are very good friends, spend a lot of time together at school, and often get together to socialize on weekends. one day a new student joins their class, and kanza immediately sends a note to ranna saying, “look at that new white girl. i bet she isn’t going to want to play with us! ” kanza’s assumptions about the new classmate based strictly on her skin color demonstrate

a. ethnocentrism.
b. socialized paranoia.
c. discrimination.
d. prejudice.

d. Prejudice.

Explanation:

A prejudice is a pre-established conception about a person or a group, this conception is generally negative and is based on general (usually misleading) concepts about characteristics shared by the group; for example, the skin color of someone determines if it is friendly.

In this case, Kanza and Ranna have prejudices about people with fair skin and are judging their new classmate based only on the skin color that they have because they do not know their new partner.

I hope this information can help you.

answer; ///(c) i believe that the correct answer is ethnic relations bear many similarities across different global; good luck

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.