It was against the law to segregate people based on race. Laws permitting separation are unconstitutional. ... Desegregation was the only option to solve this court case.
c. Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality.
The Plessy v. Ferguson case needed to decide on the constitutionality of segregation.
The decision of the case stated that segregation did not violate the 14th amendment because the act of segregation did not imply inequality. Justice Brown suggested that separating people was no proof that the separate facilities were unequal and therefore no violation had taken place.
C.Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality.
Correct answer choice is :
C) Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality. Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one preponderance, introduced the provocative separate but equal principle for evaluating the constitutionality of national discrimination laws. Plessy v. Ferguson was never reversed by the Supreme Court.
Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality
In 1892, Homer Plessy, a black man, sat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train. But Louisiana had a Separate Car Act (1890), which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites, and Plessy ended up arrested.
In the case, Plessy’s lawyer argued that the Separate Car Act violated the 13th and 14th Amendments, which established absolute equality for the races before the law.
However, the Supreme Court considered that segregation did not necessarily imply any inequality toward African Americans, and it wasn't a form of discrimination. Therefore, the doctrine of "separate but equal" was allowed to continue.
The correct answer is C. Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality.
The correct answer is C.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark decision (1896) of the U.S. Supreme Court. It upheld the constitutional right of racial segregation laws for public facilities. It is known as the 'separate but equal' doctrine, meaning that the separated facilities had to be equal in quality.
Justice Henry Billings Brown stated in his verdict that separation does not necessarily imply any inequality and that the segregation laws do not imply that a particular race was inferior.
The verdict upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation as long as the facilities were equal in quality.