The banco central administered a humanitarian plan for the government of ecuador. fernando banderas and his wife presented false claims that the bank paid. after the fraud was discovered, the bank sued banderas and his wife for damages for fraud and treble damages under the florida version of rico. banderas and his wife asserted that they were not liable for rico damages because there was no proof that they were related to organized crime and because the wrong they had committed was merely ordinary fraud. they had not used any racketeering methods. is involvement with organized crime a requirement for liability under rico? [banderas v. banco central del ecuador, 461 so. 2d 265 (fla. app.)]